CareerCup

for sure it could be legal.
===================================
int gg=0;

int& function()
{
return gg;
}

int main()
{
function()=6;
std::cout<<gg<<endl;
return 0;
}

It can be legal if 'function()' returns a reference to an integer

I don't think this could be done in C.References were introduced in C++ only,there were no references(&) in C.

illegal ... left side of the assignment operator expected to a variable.

It is illegal. They are probably looking for a understanding of lvalue and rvalue (in essence what can and cannot appear on the left hand side of an assignment).

I agree with haoguohua

I tried to declare function as "int * function" or "int * *function", both don't work..

anyone knows it?

done, I get it:

int & function()
{
int * newint = (int *)malloc(sizeof(int));
return (int &) *newint;
}

this could through g++, and also can print out the number,

Read

http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/references.html

section 8.3

I don't think, interviewer asked this question to check your understanding on reference......He seems to be concerned with lvalue and rvalue but its make sense to mention about reference after mentioned about lvalue and rvalue........

int global = 500;

int * function()
{
return &global;
}

int main()
{
*(function())= 1000;
printf("{%d}\n",*function());
getch();
return 0;
}

The above program prints 1000 as expected.

You have changed the problem statement.
The original statement was function()=x. It makes a world of difference by putting the *

Legal! The below code works perfectly fine.
int& means return by reference, basically returning the reference to address of a, which is then populated with the value on the right side of =.

int a = 10;

int& function()
{
	return a;
}
int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[])
{
	int x = 5;
	function() = x;
	return 0;
}